#Icad nypd trial
#Icad nypd free

The 911 dispatcher issued a correction two minutes later that said her neighbor was trying to kick down her own door. from a woman at 33 West 69th Street, who said that her neighbor was trying to kick down her door.

#Icad nypd trial

TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE AT TRIAL Sergeant OвЂ™Keefe and Officer IrwinвЂ™s testimony Sergeant OвЂ™Keefe and Officer Irwin responded to a 911 call on April 11, 2014, at about 3:22 a.m. The jury awarded plaintiff $300,000 for pain and suffering to the date of the verdict, $100,000 for future pain and suffering for a period of 10 years, and $500,000 in punitive damages as against Sergeant OвЂ™Keefe.

#Icad nypd free

After a three-week trial, the jury found, inter alia, that New York City Police Department (вЂњNYPDвЂќ) officers used excessive force on plaintiff on April 12, 2014, and that the excessive force used by NYPD officers was a substantial factor in causing plaintiffвЂ™s injuries that Sergeant OвЂ™Keefe used excessive force on plaintiff on April 12, 2014, and that the excessive force she used was a substantial factor in causing plaintiffвЂ™s injuries that the City had a policy of deliberate indifference with respect to the training and supervision of its police officersвЂ™ interactions with emotionally disturbed persons, and that the CityвЂ™s policy of deliberate indifference led directly to the deprivation of plaintiffвЂ™s Fourth Amendment right to be free of excessive force on April 12, 2014.

Plaintiff opposes arguing that there was enough evidence to support the juryвЂ™s determinations on liability and damages. Finally, if the juryвЂ™s verdict as to defendantsвЂ™ liability is not set aside, defendants move to set aside the juryвЂ™s award for damages unless plaintiff accepts a reduced award because the juryвЂ™s damages award deviates materially from other damages awarded in similar cases. Defendants also move to set aside the juryвЂ™s verdict as to Sergeant OвЂ™Keefe and the City of New York claiming they were denied a fair trial. Defendants further move to set aside the juryвЂ™s verdict and grant judgment in favor of Sergeant OвЂ™Keefe claiming she is entitled to qualified immunity. The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 003) 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68 were read on this motion to/for SET ASIDE VERDICT DECISION AND ORDER Upon the foregoing documents, it is decided as follows: In this excessive force, Monell claim case, defendants (also referred to as the вЂњCityвЂќ) move to set aside the juryвЂ™s verdict pursuant to CPLR В§4404(a) and grant judgment in favor of the defendants on the grounds that 1) the amount of force used by the officers against plaintiff on April 12, 2014, was reasonable as a matter of law, 2) there is insufficient evidence to support plaintiffвЂ™s Monell claim as a matter of law and 3) plaintiff failed to establish a causal connection between the use of force and the alleged unconstitutional policy or in the alternative, if judgment is not granted in defendants favor, granting a new trial on these grounds as the verdict was against the weight of the evidence.